<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What I Look for in a Follow</title>
	<atom:link href="http://silencematters.com/2010/04/20/what-i-look-for-in-a-follow/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://silencematters.com/2010/04/20/what-i-look-for-in-a-follow/</link>
	<description>An atlas of thoughts and ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 09 Nov 2011 15:50:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3-beta2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Clarke</title>
		<link>http://silencematters.com/2010/04/20/what-i-look-for-in-a-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-89</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Clarke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silencematters.com/?p=263#comment-89</guid>
		<description>+1
When the new email style came out I was so excited that I briefly missed the fact that they hadn&#039;t integrated the two most important bits of information and was dismayed to realize that all that flashiness didn&#039;t actually add anything but avatars. 

I don&#039;t read each profile as carefully as you but URL and bio are the most important info for any investigation. In my case I usually just want to know if they are spam, and the URL is often a giveaway (without it you only have the followers count which is biased against real people who are just new). 

It&#039;s so strange that Twitter acts this way. It&#039;s like they want visits to the site for ad impressions similar to facebook and it&#039;s notifications. Maybe it was a long term strategy for their new ad system...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1<br />
When the new email style came out I was so excited that I briefly missed the fact that they hadn&#8217;t integrated the two most important bits of information and was dismayed to realize that all that flashiness didn&#8217;t actually add anything but avatars. </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t read each profile as carefully as you but URL and bio are the most important info for any investigation. In my case I usually just want to know if they are spam, and the URL is often a giveaway (without it you only have the followers count which is biased against real people who are just new). </p>
<p>It&#8217;s so strange that Twitter acts this way. It&#8217;s like they want visits to the site for ad impressions similar to facebook and it&#8217;s notifications. Maybe it was a long term strategy for their new ad system&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydia Mann</title>
		<link>http://silencematters.com/2010/04/20/what-i-look-for-in-a-follow/comment-page-1/#comment-88</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydia Mann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 13:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silencematters.com/?p=263#comment-88</guid>
		<description>I, too, research each follow though not being heavily followed makes that easier. I would love if this information were provided in the email notification. It would make it much easier to spot the SPAMmer porn follows as well!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I, too, research each follow though not being heavily followed makes that easier. I would love if this information were provided in the email notification. It would make it much easier to spot the SPAMmer porn follows as well!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

