silencematters

Each frame of this stop-motion video is an picture of 1000 decisions.

In this unique time-lapse video created from thousands of individual frames, photographers Scott Andrews, Stan Jirman and Philip Scott Andrews condense six weeks of painstaking work into three minutes, 52 seconds (read here how they did it).

When it was done, Poindexter had what he’d wanted—a unique visual record of an intricate workflow that’s been going on at NASA’s Kennedy Space Center for nearly 30 years—and, with the shuttle’s impending retirement, is about to come to an end.

It is rare that people take a step back and honor the processes that were put in place to make a complex endeavor, like the shuttle launch, happen in a matter of minutes.

*My apologies for embedding a video with a long 30 second ad. It was the only one I could find

I am sure Canon knows about the C.H.D.K. project, they just don’t know how to deal with a community modifying the products they make – or that is the message I get when they declined to comment in this article in the Times.

Canon did not want to comment directly upon the C.H.D.K. project or whether it could harm the camera, saying only that untested software might “damage Canon equipment.”

It would have been a great move on their part to comment favorably to some degree on the innovations that were made here. It would also be relatively cheap for them to start up a blog about working with Canon technology, but they don’t even have to go that far. Mere acknowledgment is all that is needed.

This map was created using the Ushahidi open source software by students at Tulane University in conjunction with the Louisiana Bucket Brigade and site host Radical Designs so that you, the citizens of the Gulf Coast have a voice to speak out in testimony of the how the Gulf oil spill is threatening your livelihoods and the ecosystems that you love and rely on. More about the group »

They also have a long list of other news and community resources that are pulling together updates and service announcements for all the communities that are affected by the spill.

So why is this so interesting?
Because it is a web recipe that has the possibility of gaining some real weight as it attempts to collect the news, information, and community service messages that make up the oil spill story as a whole. When I say web recipe, I mean it uses tools (an obsessive list of links + Ushahidi) that are being made available to anyone with basic web skills and the will to pull together the information.

The point at which we’ll know if their endeavors are fruitful will be when they have collected enough of the right information and news to generate a compelling experience of the whole story. I will be watching and encouraging, and I wish them all the best.

Ushahidi is a platform that allows anyone to gather distributed data via SMS, e-mail or a web site and visualize it on a map or timeline. Watch this short video on it.

It is nice to see the students at Tulane University putting it to the test.

The most important element on any Twitter profile is the person’s bio, then the URL, which I control-click and open in a new tab. Yes I visit every blog for every follower that has ever followed me. In fact, that is how I find out about so many great blogs.

I find a person’s blog to be the determining factor for a follow, not the number of followers someone has. The bio and the linked website are the 2 elements that are the most relevant rich – maybe the photo as a distant 3rd option – which is why I am surprised to see that the follow notification e-mails still don’t include the profile information.

@xrisfg on Twitter

I am assuming that most people don’t comb through the follow notification e-mails as often as I do, but I am quite convinced that if Twitter would include the user’s profile information in them, they would find that the notification e-mail would be a richer means of following more users.

This week, The New York Times launched a new video series called, TimesCast.

The program, called TimesCast, lasting a few minutes, will appear on the nytimes.com home page at 1 p.m. each day; after 2 p.m., it will move to a less prominent position on the site. (It can always be found at nytimes.com/timescast.) It features interviews with editors and reporters who are covering the major stories, and scenes from meetings among the paper’s top editors discussing events that might go on the front page.

— from Media Decoder

For the most part I would say it is an accurate description of the candor that I experience while working in this large newsroom. In a lot of ways, it is kinda like watching a dry version of The Office. The camera angles are more immediate, and the editing appears to be mostly in-camera, which is refreshing. It also is an example of appointment based viewing on the internet, which doesn’t happen very often on the web, and is still a bit foreign to the way I expect to consume media these days.

I would like to know what the average person thinks about this series. Does it provide more context to the top stories of the day? Is it too much inside baseball?

All said, I have been excited to sit down and watch it take shape.

Note: While I do work at the Times, I do not work on the TimesCast video production team.