<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>silencematters &#187; collaboration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://silencematters.com/tag/collaboration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://silencematters.com</link>
	<description>An atlas of thoughts and ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Remixing and Collaborative Value</title>
		<link>http://silencematters.com/2010/01/05/remixing-and-collaborative-value/</link>
		<comments>http://silencematters.com/2010/01/05/remixing-and-collaborative-value/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jan 2010 03:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Zilar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[art]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[remixing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[value]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silencematters.com/?p=233</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Once you liberate the code, you put yourself in a place
where you are forced to become more creative and move beyond the
original idea.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I sat down to work on the WordPress theme that I hope to release soon,  I came across a relevant comment that I made on <a href="http://rhizome.org/discuss/view/20420#39199">an old Rhizome thread</a> back in February &#8217;06 in response to the question, <em>&#8230;[Should Artists be] required to expose their code in order to receive financial support?</em> The question was originally posted by new-media artist <a href="http://www.smileproject.com/">Jason Van Anden</a>. I thought my comment was a nice to dig back up and re-post since it makes relevant points about the nature of creation, and collaborative value.<span id="more-233"></span></p>
<blockquote><p>I think that once you liberate the code, you put yourself in a place<br />
where you are forced to become more creative and move beyond the<br />
original idea.</p>
<p>There are 2 ways to think about this: you can hold on to your idea, and<br />
it will only grow out of your own experiences with it. Or you can let it<br />
go, and be inspired by how other are using your creation.</p>
<p>At the root, it comes down to respecting the idea. If it is not ready to<br />
be shared, then it should not be shared. Once it is ready, I think you<br />
have to let it go, and enjoy it&#8217;s effects on the world around you. This<br />
is true for any medium. It is about having respect for your idea. I<br />
agree, it is a very hard switch to make, especially with code, because<br />
it feels like people can copy what you have done much more easily than a<br />
painting. You can always get a Creative Commons License on it that<br />
specifies that the person interested in using part of, or all of your<br />
code, contact you first &#8211; but that it is open to use.</p>
<p>The greatest thing about technology is that it fosters collaboration of<br />
ideas&#8230;. and to think that collaboration is not part of your process,<br />
then you had better not look at the source code of a nice site/piece<br />
ever again, or for that matter, stop thinking about process altogether.<br />
Code is about copying &#038; pasting &#8211; it is remixing what the person before<br />
you has done with what you have done. This is also true across all mediums.</p>
<p>How well have you taken the ideas of the past, remixed them, and made<br />
them new again?</p>
<p>I think it is also important to look at why your piece is successful.<br />
Does your piece rely on you knowing something about programming to fully<br />
enjoy the piece? If your piece relies on the fact that you made some<br />
genius little script to &#8216;wow&#8217; the viewer, then that leads me to think<br />
that your code could be considered part of the art.</p>
<p>these are just a few ideas&#8230;</p></blockquote>
<p>On one hand, the whole world has changed on the internet since February, 2006. Then again, all of the same principles still apply. This still leaves open the question, what constitutes as Art from here forward? </p>
<p>Here is <a href="http://rhizome.org/discuss/view/20420#39199">the original Rhizome thread</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://silencematters.com/2010/01/05/remixing-and-collaborative-value/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>A Better Twitter Directory</title>
		<link>http://silencematters.com/2009/04/17/a-better-twitter-directory/</link>
		<comments>http://silencematters.com/2009/04/17/a-better-twitter-directory/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2009 21:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Zilar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[collaboration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Muckrack]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silencematters.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A number of people have been asking for a good twitter directory of NYTimes.com journalists. Now there is one, and more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A number of people have been asking for a good twitter directory of journalists. Now there is one. <a href="http://muckrack.com/">Muckrack</a> is a basic site that has created a growing directory of journalists organized by media outlet. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, this is no Facebook for journalists, but this is a great way to reach out to old colleagues, connect with other newsrooms, and collaborate on breaking news. Be warned, it does require that you commit to using <a href="http://twitter.com/">Twitter</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://silencematters.com/2009/04/17/a-better-twitter-directory/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

