<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>silencematters &#187; news</title>
	<atom:link href="http://silencematters.com/tag/news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://silencematters.com</link>
	<description>An atlas of thoughts and ideas.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:05:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4-beta1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Future of Books Online</title>
		<link>http://silencematters.com/2009/03/29/the-future-of-books-online/</link>
		<comments>http://silencematters.com/2009/03/29/the-future-of-books-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Zilar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[publishing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silencematters.com/?p=174</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The future of information includes the future archive of our books and printed material &#8211; a matter not often talked about in the drive to educate ourselves online. That is why I found Robert Darnton&#8217;s On the Media interview and article in the New York Review of Books about Google&#8217;s plans to for Book Search really relevant to the chatter that is going around about the future of news and information. He says, &#8220;To digitize collections and sell the product in ways that fail to guarantee wide access would be to repeat the mistake that was made when publishers exploited <a class="more" href="http://silencematters.com/2009/03/29/the-future-of-books-online/">Read more...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The future of information includes the future archive of our books and printed material &#8211; a matter not often talked about in the drive to educate ourselves online. That is why I found <a href="http://www.news.harvard.edu/gazette/2007/05.24/99-library.html">Robert Darnton&#8217;s</a> <a href="http://www.onthemedia.org/transcripts/2009/03/27/06">On the Media interview</a> and <a href="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22281#">article in the New York Review of Books</a> about Google&#8217;s plans to for <a href="http://books.google.com/">Book Search</a> really relevant to the chatter that is going around about the future of news and information.</p>
<p>He says,</p>
<blockquote cite="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22281#"><p>&#8220;To digitize collections and sell the product in ways that fail to guarantee wide access would be to repeat the mistake that was made when publishers exploited the market for scholarly journals, but on a much greater scale, for it would turn the Internet into an instrument for privatizing knowledge that belongs in the public sphere.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<blockquote cite="http://www.nybooks.com/articles/22281#"><p>&#8220;Yes, we must digitize. But more important, we must democratize. We must open access to our cultural heritage. How? By rewriting the rules of the game, by subordinating private interests to the public good, and by taking inspiration from the early republic in order to create a Digital Republic of Learning.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://silencematters.com/2009/03/29/the-future-of-books-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Demand for the Printed Word</title>
		<link>http://silencematters.com/2008/11/05/the-demand-for-the-printed-word/</link>
		<comments>http://silencematters.com/2008/11/05/the-demand-for-the-printed-word/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2008 18:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Zilar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYTimes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[print]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silencematters.com/?p=136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hundreds wait in line for a copy of The New York Times, the day after Barack Obama is elected President On the day after Barack Obama was elected President, people began lining up out side the New York Times in hopes to get a copy of the actual newspaper. As Khoi noted, Print&#8217;s Not Dead. As Brian Stelter posted, that they are printing and additional 50,000 copies for the late run for the P.M. rush. More photos from Nedward.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="flickr-photo w500"><img width="500" src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3149/3005118619_b850282f01.jpg?v=0" alt="In line for The New York Times" /><span class="caption">Hundreds wait in line for a copy of The New York Times, the day after Barack Obama is elected President</span></div>
<p>On the day after <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/11/06/us/politics/06elect.html">Barack Obama was elected President</a>, people began lining up out side the New York Times in hopes to get a copy of the actual newspaper. As Khoi noted, <a href="http://www.subtraction.com/2008/11/05/prints-not-dead">Print&#8217;s Not Dead</a>. As <a href="http://twitter.com/brianstelter/status/992006363">Brian Stelter posted</a>, that they are printing and additional 50,000 copies for the late run for the P.M. rush.</p>
<p>More photos from <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/nedward/3005099397/">Nedward</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://silencematters.com/2008/11/05/the-demand-for-the-printed-word/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How Newspapers Address an Evolving Audience</title>
		<link>http://silencematters.com/2008/06/05/how-newspapers-address-a-evolving-audience/</link>
		<comments>http://silencematters.com/2008/06/05/how-newspapers-address-a-evolving-audience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Zilar</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Essays]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYTimes]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://silencematters.com/2008/06/05/how-newspapers-address-a-evolving-audience/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a post on Publishing 2.0 that is worth reading &#8211; What Newspapers Still Don’t Understand About The Web. It talks about how newspaper websites are still talking to a print audience. &#8220;And what’s the root cause problem? The useless article with no real-time data and no links was written for the PRINT newspaper. And the homepage is edited to match what will be important in the PRINT newspaper. And the navigation assumes I think like I do when I’m reading the PRINT newspaper. Want local news? Go to the metro SECTION.&#8221; It is nice to see that the <a class="more" href="http://silencematters.com/2008/06/05/how-newspapers-address-a-evolving-audience/">Read more...</a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a post on Publishing 2.0 that is worth reading &#8211; <a href="http://publishing2.com/2008/06/04/what-newspapers-still-dont-understand-about-the-web/">What Newspapers Still Don’t Understand About The Web</a>. It talks about how newspaper websites are still talking to a print audience.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;And what’s the root cause problem? The useless article with no real-time data and no links was written for the PRINT newspaper. And the homepage is edited to match what will be important in the PRINT newspaper. And the navigation assumes I think like I do when I’m reading the PRINT newspaper. Want local news? Go to the metro SECTION.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>It is nice to see that the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html">blog ghetto</a> is more favorable and usable than Washington Post:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Here’s an idea for newspaper website homepages — just a search box and a list of blogs. Seriously. Instead of putting all the web-native content and publishing in the <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/ref/topnews/blog-index.html">blog ghetto</a>, like NYTimes.com does, why not make that the WHOLE site? (I mean seriously, having a blog section on the website is like having a section in the paper for 14 column inch stories.)&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>While he makes a number of good points, I still think there is a great deal of work that needs to be done to encourage, change, shift (enter adjective here) our culture to get their news and updates online. It will gradually happen, give it time&#8230; I think most people are still going to turn to TV and radio to get the most current information, and both of those forms still have something that the webs doesnt &#8211; a human connection.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://silencematters.com/2008/06/05/how-newspapers-address-a-evolving-audience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

